Moderator: 2020vision
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:33 pm
by doris_day » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:01 pm
by doris_day » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:03 pm
by doris_day » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:09 pm
by milfor » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:14 pm
by Captain Sensible » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:29 pm
mauqqq wrote:
Can anyone see where I'm going wrong. These systems are making quite alot of money, so I'm not just gonna give them up. If they don't like me running them on my own account then theres nothing stopping other people running them surely?
What do people think?
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:30 pm
doris_day wrote:Also, it does depend on the strategy you're employing. If you're one of those mutherFG%%4££3s that lay at 1.49 for 0.01p then Betfair are quite right in what they're doing but if you have a legimate strategy thats not taking advantage in some underhand way, then I'm sure we can find a way round the mutherf%%$$ing PC.
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 pm
milfor wrote:I am not fond of the premium charge but I think that the transaction charge is justified. Your strategy seems to be very transaction consuming so you have distributed it to different accounts and IP addresses to use more than 1000 transactions per hour. I can understand that they don't like that because it outsmarts the transaction charge and nullifies its goal that not one single strategy should use an exaggerated part of their resources.
Find out in which hour which 1000 transactions bring the most profit and leave out the other ones. Otherwise they will ban your accounts/IPs/strategy completely forever (if that hasn't happened already).
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:51 pm
Captain Sensible wrote:mauqqq wrote:
Can anyone see where I'm going wrong. These systems are making quite alot of money, so I'm not just gonna give them up. If they don't like me running them on my own account then theres nothing stopping other people running them surely?
What do people think?
Not really given us too much to go on. Although as you've said you're "licensing out your software" I'm assuming you're not using gruss and probably some own coded software. I'd guess that's how they've linked accounts if the same vendor ID is being used in a small block of accounts.
The PC charges aren't really avoidable and if your strategies are as profitable as you state I wouldn't worry too much about paying an extra 16% or so just treat it as another cost.
As for the transaction charges that's the tricky one as it all depends on how much you're hammering the site as to whether that will make things harder to get around.
Depending on how profitable your systems are you'll find that the transaction charges can be offset against comms paid so I'd look at that side first. Unless you're really hammering the site you'll probably find you can happily run all systems from one account without any hassle from betfair.
Just have a look at recoding the transaction side as they'll always be times you can take your foot off the pedal. I'd certainly look at all options before going down dedicated servers routes as the PC avoidance team are likely to be keeping an eye out for you now anyway
by milfor » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:53 pm
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:59 pm
milfor wrote:You made this split to avoid transaction charges. Betfair found out and stopped it. Transaction charge would be totally useless if Betfair would allow everyone to run his strategies on 1 account for the markets A-M and on another account for the markets N-Z. With that 'system' nobody would pay transaction charges at all and could pump an unlimited number of transactions into the system.
by Captain Sensible » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:06 pm
mauqqq wrote:well im not using a vendor id yet... im not sure if its applicable to me.
ive never had a problem with the PC, its an automated system, so as long as its profitable it doesnt matter. much ;(
I had been looking into making my code more transaction efficient, but as theyve suspended my account again i can't test anything.
by mauqqq » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:18 pm
Captain Sensible wrote:mauqqq wrote:well im not using a vendor id yet... im not sure if its applicable to me.
ive never had a problem with the PC, its an automated system, so as long as its profitable it doesnt matter. much ;(
I had been looking into making my code more transaction efficient, but as theyve suspended my account again i can't test anything.
Are you using the free API or gruss ? Only asking cos of data charges.
If it's the free API then I guess data charges won't come into it and it'll only be the transaction charge that's the problem. So then that would only become a problem if your commission isn't enough to offset those and you'd need to split the strategies over separate accounts.
That's all supposing your strategy isn't employing any underhand means like hidden bets etc which betfair rightly frown upon.
by Captain Sensible » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:29 pm
by Spike » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:40 pm
The strength of Gruss Software is that it’s been designed by one of you, a frustrated sports punter, and then developed by listening to dozens of like-minded enthusiasts.
Gruss is owned and run by brothers Gary and Mark Russell. Gary discovered Betfair in 2004 and soon realised that using bespoke software to place bets was much more efficient than merely placing them through the website.
Gary built his own software and then enhanced its features after trialling it through other Betfair users and reacting to their improvement ideas, something that still happens today.
He started making a small monthly charge so he could work on it full-time and then recruited Mark to help develop the products and Gruss Software was born.
We think it’s the best of its kind and so do a lot of our customers. But you can never stand still in this game and we’ll continue to improve the software if any more great ideas emerge.