Bookmaking Maths

Discuss anything related to using the program (eg. triggered betting tactics)

Moderator: 2020vision

Postby manager1 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:55 pm

The horse was Penang Princess FYI.

Just got Tittle rolled also ;)
User avatar
manager1
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Australia

Postby joe lively » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:06 pm

Yes I was on Penang Princess also, I layed at 7.40 IP. :D
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby manager1 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:09 pm

Well done, I gone ripped off then!

:D

These sort of results really fire you up and you wonder why you ever doubted it - but sooner or later a string of winners forces you to reality.

However, it's the end result that counts and longterm I'm at 120% ROI after paying 4% commission.
User avatar
manager1
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Australia

Postby joe lively » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:25 pm

Yes I think i'm due a couple of winners on the trot. But like you said i'm in for the long haul.

The way I proved it last year was to back the shorteners, and I did my proverbials


lol couple of weeks ago I came up with an in running system using excel, I actually came up with it whilst lying awake at night.

To cut a long story short my idea was that when the IP back side drops below 98% then something short is on the move out and there is some value with one of the shorter prices

Needless to say by the end of racing that day I had as you say done my "proverbials"
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby manager1 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:38 pm

Great minds think alike Joe.
One would assume that if you only backed favourites, or any horse for that matter, that was running well (hadn't missed the start, hadn't got a knock in running and had a decent position and was making a move or running in front) you'd have to win.

Well, some of them always find a way to get beat - lucky for us eh?
User avatar
manager1
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:17 am
Location: Australia

Postby joe lively » Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:55 pm

Diriculous matched soon as the market turned IP at 2.5, finished 3rd. official SP 2.86. :D
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby laffo16 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:14 pm

hey guys, sorry to intrude ^^, so am i to understand this correctly, once the market goes in-play you lay all selections at 10% less then the odds last given by ladys. then cancel all remaining bets after the first bet is matched?

so would 7.0 at ladys, be layed at 6.3?
User avatar
laffo16
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:52 pm

Postby joe lively » Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:36 pm

In a nutshell yes, I use 10% but I think Manager uses a different calculation, he's probably better postioned to answer that part.

The idea is to lay below bookies odds by taking advantage of over enthusiatic backers early in the race or the fluctuations as the market goes in play.

The 7:20 at kempton tonight was a good example, Within a second of the market going in play i was able to lay Adorn at 1.64, the bookies SP was 1.83. Granted the bloody thing went on to win but it doesn't matter because long term laying below bookies sp we should show a profit. :?
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby laffo16 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:15 pm

right i see :) unfortunate with that one!

when exactly do your make the bets, just before the off? with using the IP (carry onto in-play trigger). or actually once the race has gone in-play.
User avatar
laffo16
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:52 pm

Postby joe lively » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:03 pm

Now my trigger places my bets as soon as the market goes In Play, I normally get matched in the first few seconds, far too early for the race to take shape. I used to place bets at 00:00:00 but found I sometimes got matched on a steamer and end up paying above sp.

Anyway if your interested here are todays results from Kempton, unfortunate that most the racing was abondoned today, still Wolverhampton to go later.

2:20:
Kylnch layed @ 20. sp was 26.
Square eddie layed @ 9.4 sp was 10
2:50:
Many volumes layed @ 3.5. sp was 3.5
3.25:
Cape hawk layed @ 11. sp was 12
4:00:
Captain Ramius layed @ 2.7. sp was 2.88
4:30:
Minus fifteen layed @ 12. sp was 13
5:00:
Precision break layed @ 5.6. sp was 6
5:30:
Dawn Sky layed @ 19.5 sp was 21
Black Gin layed @ 15.5 sp was 17

As you can see sometimes more than one gets matched. The above has shown a small loss today but this should give you some idea what i'm doing. I expect losing days we'll see how it looks this time next week.

Also I think 10% below sp is too much, I was working to 6% today.

Onto Wolverhampton :?
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby KevinTHFC » Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:51 am

Interesting thread guys.

Have you factored comission on your winning bets into your thoughts ?

Kevin
KevinTHFC
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:08 pm

Postby joe lively » Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:45 pm

I think manager1 said somewhere that he is looking at 120% ROI after paying 4% commission.

The way i'm looking at is that the bookies overround is something like 2-3% per horse then 5% for the book (please correct me if this wrong :? ) plus the 6% i'm addding in, then minus bf commision, what is left is my profit. A small percentage, but long term with a decent bank should be worth while.

Incidently yesterday finished in profit following the late meeting at wolverhampton :)
joe lively
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby xraymitch » Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:51 pm

Just discovered this conversation while having a break from playing with Excel over the last five hours.

When I can get my brain together ( I am still dazed from my attempts at writing macros :? ) I woud like to check this out further.

Nice one guys 8)

Cheers,

Ray
xraymitch
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:06 am
Location: UK

Postby dgs2001 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:59 pm

Great thread guys

I'm interested to know if people using this method have noticed any hiccups or problems in the last 10 days or so as more people try this out?.

Duncan
User avatar
dgs2001
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: The Home Of National Hunt

Postby stateless » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:08 am

dgs2001 wrote:Great thread guys

I'm interested to know if people using this method have noticed any hiccups or problems in the last 10 days or so as more people try this out?.

Duncan


I've only just starting using it, and had a similiar concern. In theory if more and more people are mopping up any "outlier" type prices early in the race, surely eventually the prices being taken will in fact be pretty much price-to-chance, or eventually worse still prices which could be thought to be generous. I could be wrong of course, but this is something that came to mind. I'm thinking aloud.
stateless
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:55 am

PreviousNext

Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests

Sports betting software from Gruss Software


The strength of Gruss Software is that it’s been designed by one of you, a frustrated sports punter, and then developed by listening to dozens of like-minded enthusiasts.

Gruss is owned and run by brothers Gary and Mark Russell. Gary discovered Betfair in 2004 and soon realised that using bespoke software to place bets was much more efficient than merely placing them through the website.

Gary built his own software and then enhanced its features after trialling it through other Betfair users and reacting to their improvement ideas, something that still happens today.

He started making a small monthly charge so he could work on it full-time and then recruited Mark to help develop the products and Gruss Software was born.

We think it’s the best of its kind and so do a lot of our customers. But you can never stand still in this game and we’ll continue to improve the software if any more great ideas emerge.