Moderator: 2020vision
by Ian » Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:17 pm
by Captain Sensible » Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:45 pm
by GaryRussell » Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:13 pm
Ian wrote:If you back at 6.8 shouldn't you be laying at 3.4 ? ie. using the decimal odds rather than the fractional odds. If you use decimal odds for the calculation you will win the same as the original stake if matched but you may not get as many matched.
Once you have installed the latest Beta version it is important that you tick "Calculate tick % on decimal odds" in general preferences. This will ensure the odds are calculated how you expect. If you use this trigger then you don't need the VBA code to calculate the elapsed time from start of race. You also don't need to output the SP column.
by john_boyuk » Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:14 pm
Captain Sensible wrote:There are a few problems with laying at half decimal odds when you get lower down the odds ladder i'e what if you back around 3 or even 2.1
by john_boyuk » Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:35 pm
Captain Sensible wrote:There are a few problems with laying at half decimal odds when you get lower down the odds ladder i'e what if you back around 3 or even 2.1
by Captain Sensible » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:03 pm
by john_boyuk » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:56 pm
Captain Sensible wrote:Strictly speaking , odds wise 4.7 isn't half of 9.4, remember with decimal odds 1 of the mumber is your stake, so 9.4 is really 8.4 to 1. Half of that would be 8.4/2 + 1 = 5.2.
If we follow the same method and lay a decimal back odds of 4 your lay odds will be 2 and you'll make £2 if it goes onto win and £2 if it loses but the actual lay odds are a lot greater than 50%.
It's all down to what you want to do , if you want to lay at 50% of the odds you'll need to comprise, depending on the odds won't always be assured of £2 either way obviously the higher up the ladder you play the less effect that 1 off the decimal odds comes into play, if you want to guarentee a win equal to your stake either way you'll have to be aware lower down the ladder you're laying a lot higher than 50%
by john_boyuk » Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:09 pm
Ian wrote:Gary has told you how to do it in the post above.
by Online Trader » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:46 am
The tick offset options you refer to are for manual betting, they have no impact on triggers. You have to use the appropriate trigger modifier to specify tick offset. For example to place a back bet at SP then lay at 50% odds you would use BACK-P50-SP. In the odds column you should use odds that will not get matched to ensure it is converted to an SP bet at the off so I recommend using 990.
by Online Trader » Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:08 am
by Online Trader » Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:21 pm
by GaryRussell » Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:38 pm
Online Trader wrote:Hi Gary
OK, i tried this in the 2:10 at Catterick and it did place the lay bet but not with a stake of 4 and the lay odds were not 50% of the back odds:
The strength of Gruss Software is that it’s been designed by one of you, a frustrated sports punter, and then developed by listening to dozens of like-minded enthusiasts.
Gruss is owned and run by brothers Gary and Mark Russell. Gary discovered Betfair in 2004 and soon realised that using bespoke software to place bets was much more efficient than merely placing them through the website.
Gary built his own software and then enhanced its features after trialling it through other Betfair users and reacting to their improvement ideas, something that still happens today.
He started making a small monthly charge so he could work on it full-time and then recruited Mark to help develop the products and Gruss Software was born.
We think it’s the best of its kind and so do a lot of our customers. But you can never stand still in this game and we’ll continue to improve the software if any more great ideas emerge.